Well, gcc also supports "force-including" via the command line. But that's still a valid point. If the way we use precompiled headers needs it to be included in the .cpp file, I'd say it's a valid exception to the rule.
-- Nicolás 2012/8/1 Rom Walton <[email protected]>: > That might break pre-compiled header use on platforms other than Windows. I > think I am force including the pre-compiled header in the Windows project > files. > > Generally compilers enforce the first include file has to be the pre-compiled > header file before all others. > > It may not be a big deal. > > ----- Rom > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Anderson > Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 4:15 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [boinc_dev] Coding style and includes. > > OK, let's adopt this convention. > -- David > > On 01-Aug-2012 12:54 PM, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: >> I wouldn't really reverse it; going from general to specific is good >> too. As David Coss said, Google's C++ guidelines are worth looking. >> It's basically a combination of what you said and what I said: first >> the .h file for this .cpp file, and *then* go from general to specific >> (system headers, other libraries' headers, BOINC's headers). >> _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
