OK, forget about it then. I only use that system for crunching so I just told 
it not to
recognize the card. It's a 256MB card and I thought it was on the motherboard 
at first
and was concerned about losing the whole system. In researching temps for it, I 
did find
people talking about screen blanking or thermal cutoff at 110 C. Now that I 
know it's an
actual card, I'll just replace it with something more modern that has good 
temperature
control and uses very little power. Going from 80nm to 28nm is a big step. 
Apparently,
these 8400 gs chips are quite variable and this machine has an overheating chip 
in it or
a bad cooling solution. I also saw mention of some versions of the driver 
causing the
chip to go into thermal runaway. I might even replace the system. It's the 
original Core
2 quad and isn't upgradable to even a later C2Q. A current Ivy Bridge 22nm 
Intel I3
could probably match it for about a third the power of a Q6600. Some or all of 
the Ivy
bridge parts can run OpenCL and Haswell is due out later this year which is 
supposed to
have up to a 5x improvement on the graphics, depending on model, and includes 
the AVX2
extensions with larger FP units on the CPU cores IIRC (could be broadwell that 
has
those). APUs are eating much of the discrete graphics card market. Now that 
ST_E (sp??)
has got FD-SOI working and global foundries has licensed it, expect some 
improvements
from AMD APUs too. Now, if they can just solve the power supply problem for EUV
lithography, they'll be set for 10nm and below. It's scary how they power EUV. 
Think
very high powered lasers vaporizing a stream of metal droplets and missing the 
droplet a
lot of the time.

Anyway, since it seems that the chip failing will not take out the motherboard, 
and most
peoples cards are better than mine or have already been replaced, don't worry 
about it.

Sorry to have bothered you about it.

David Ball



> I would be opposed to BOINC telling me I can't use my 8400 GS because it
> might overheat.  If it is decided that it is a good idea and they should be
> banned, then BOINC should not allow crunching on laptops, cell phones, etc.
> because they also tend to overheat. Or, we let users decide whether to
> crunch or not and allow them to tune the GPU apps such that they can run at
> whatever temperatures they are comfortable with.
>
> Jon Sonntag


_______________________________________________
boinc_dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.

Reply via email to