>And for many of the changes some people want, there are other people who want
>the opposite. For example, some projects feel that having OpenCL separately
>associated with each vendor is important because some hardware architectures
>are not as well suited to OpenCl as others.
Sure, it's convenient feature.
Hence it would be good to have some way (and from your prev replies I infered
it presents already) to have separate OpenCL_* types for different device types
_and_ generic OpenCL device type that will include all capable devices (maybe
even with additional separation OpenCL_GPU and OpenCL_CPU as it done in OpenCL
itself).
_______________________________________________
boinc_dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.
