And that answers my question. Thank you.

-Juha


On 25 July 2013 00:00, David Anderson <[email protected]> wrote:

> BOINC's approach is to collect as much info as possible in the client,
> and to use this info in the server to make scheduling decisions.
>
> We recently added code in the client to detect AVX;
> this will appear in the next client release.
>
> -- David
>
>
> On 24-Jul-2013 1:38 PM, Juha wrote:
>
>> What's going on is:
>>
>> I think the best place to check for supported (=hardware+software)
>> processor features is on the client--side.
>>
>> Everybody else thinks I'm being stupid for thinking that this could be a
>> problem later on. And even if it turns out to be a problem they think the
>> best place to check for the support is on the server-side and every
>> project
>> can code their own checks.
>>
>> -Juha
>>
>>
>> On 24 July 2013 00:53, Wolfgang Schwieger <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>  Maybe I am to stupid to understand what's going on, but.....
>>>
>>> BOINC reports a cpu feature (AVX) which the cpu has/or has not. (that is
>>> what we need!)
>>> BOINC !_also_! reports the OS, the OS version/kernel version, !_and_! the
>>> installed service pack (for windows).
>>>
>>> So, if a project has an application with AVX code, the project (!!!) has
>>> to
>>> decide if/or if not this application will run under an "older" OS.
>>>
>>> BOINC just reports the feature, the project admin configures what has to
>>> be
>>> configured.
>>>
>>> Wolfgang
>>>
>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>> Von: Juha [mailto:juha.sointusalo@gmail.**com<[email protected]>
>>> ]
>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. Juli 2013 22:58
>>> An: BOINC Developers Mailing List
>>> Betreff: Re: [boinc_dev] [SPAM] Re: : BOINC (windows) doesn't report avx
>>> processor feature
>>>
>>> On 23 July 2013 04:41, Michael Goetz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>  I'm not very worried about lock of OS support for AVX, at least as far
>>>> as PrimeGrid is concerned.
>>>>
>>>> * It's unlikely anyone has bought a pre-configured computer with an
>>>> AVX capable CPU that came with a version of Windows that doesn't support
>>>>
>>> AVX.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> * People who built their own systems and loaded XP?!?! on it are
>>>> certainly able to load and run Linux if they wish to, and if they
>>>> loaded Win 7 without SP1 they can load SP1.
>>>>
>>>> * It's unclear to me why anyone would buy, sell, or build a computer
>>>> with an AVX CPU with an operating system that doesn't support the
>>>> instruction set.  It's possible, but unlikely.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Well, someone could have upgraded to a newer CPU, or replaced a broken
>>> component without upgrading the OS at the same time. Or they might be
>>> stuck
>>> with an older OS because they have some device for which there's drivers
>>> only for, say, XP. Or they are forced for some other reasons to keep
>>> using
>>> an older OS. There are reasons once you start looking for them.
>>>
>>> And even if none of those hold, people still have the right to be silly
>>> and
>>> keep using XP.
>>>
>>>
>>>  * There's about a 40% increase in speed with the AVX version of that
>>>> application, so if there's anyone participating in that subproject
>>>> with such a computer, they probably will want to upgrade or switch
>>>> their OS to take advantage of the increased performance.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> That's a very nice speed-up. But you are assuming that:
>>> 1. People are paying attention (to such details). Maybe at PrimeGrid
>>> that's
>>> true but I doubt that's true generally speaking. At least at
>>> Seti@homethere
>>> are people turning in thousands and thousands of invalids so obviously
>>> they
>>> don't pay any attention to what their computer does.
>>> 2. People are buying or configuring their systems to crunch numbers. True
>>> for some people but I think the majority buys computers for some other
>>> reason and install BOINC to have something for the computer to do while
>>> they
>>> read their emails.
>>>
>>>
>>>  * After all that, if there's actually someone who wants to run their
>>>> fancy new CPU with an OS that cripples its capabilities, I can always
>>>> change the plan class to restrict the OS to versions that do support
>>>> AVX.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> There's one problem with that approach. Every project that releases AVX
>>> application would need to add those restrictions. Wasn't BOINC supposed
>>> to
>>> handle everything that's common to all projects so that projects can then
>>> concentrate on doing whatever science they do? So IMHO reliable
>>> information
>>> of host's capabilities is something that BOINC should provide, one way or
>>> the other.
>>>
>>> So either the client should report only those processor features that the
>>> OS
>>> supports or the scheduler should have a function does_host_support_avx()
>>> that checks both the reported features and the OS version.
>>>
>>> (Generally speaking. There's one benefit for the server side check. If
>>> the
>>> host has support for feature X in hardware but not in software, the
>>> server
>>> could tell the user "Your host has support for feature X and we have an
>>> application that can take advantage of it. But you need to install Y
>>> first."
>>> Similar to what the server currently does with at least NVIDIA
>>> drivers.)
>>>
>>> In short, while this is a theoretical problem, I don't think the lack of
>>>
>>>> AVX support in old versions of Windows is a significant real world
>>>>
>>> problem.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> That may very well be true, but I still see it as something that could be
>>> done better, if not even as a bug.
>>>
>>> -Juha
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  ______________________________**_________________
>> boinc_dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/**mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev<http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev>
>> To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
>> (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
>>
>>  ______________________________**_________________
> boinc_dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/**mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev<http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev>
> To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
> (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
>
_______________________________________________
boinc_dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.

Reply via email to