Provided the Berkeley builds keep reasonably up-to-date with the development 
mainline. There have been some lengthy pauses recently, e.g. during the Android 
push - as you can tell by the length of the changelist for v7.3.18



>________________________________
> From: Jord van der Elst <[email protected]>
>To: Rom Walton <[email protected]> 
>Cc: BOINC Dev Mailing List <[email protected]> 
>Sent: Thursday, 22 May 2014, 17:14
>Subject: Re: [boinc_dev] WINBUILD: Minimum supported VS is now VS 2010
> 
>
>Okay,
>
>So the old CompileClient page is really out of date by now. Do we want
>a new one, or is it better that Windows users use as much as possible
>the official recommended version, and that those that like to live
>dangerously can use an exotic like a development version?
>If we want a new CompileClient page for Windows, I don't mind writing
>it. I'll just need pointers, such as what are the requirements these
>days, which version of VS2010 at minimum, which service pack, which
>SDK?
>Do we need pre-built OpenSSL, Zlib, LibCurl, SQLite3, and other
>libraries, or are they only in self-built versions available?
>WxWidgets is 3.0, but what else?
>
>Rom and I wrote the original CC page for Windows, and I know it was
>broken within months of us putting in the final dot, so I assume
>that's going to be the case now as well.
>Perhaps it is better that Windows users use the Berkeley built versions... :-)
>
>-- Jord van der Elst.
>
>
>On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Rom Walton <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Over the last few months I've been pruning the source tree of legacy Windows
>> code.  1200+ lines so far.
>>
>>
>>
>> I suspect that BOINC will not even compile on VS 2005 anymore.  I removed a
>> bunch of #defines from hostinfo_win.cpp which are present in the VS 2010
>> Windows SDK but not in the VS 2005 Windows SDK.  There were also a bunch of
>> places where we were doing a LoadLibrary/GetProcAddress instead of calling
>> the API directly so that we could run on older versions of Windows.  I've
>> been cleaning that up as well.
>>
>>
>>
>> The commit in question just modified a shell script used by one of VS's
>> post-build events to update DLLs in the build directory.  I also use the
>> same script to validate/upload symbol files and code sign the stuff we
>> release.
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Rom
>>
>>
>>
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Eric J
>> Korpela
>>
>>
>> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 11:19 AM
>> To: Jord van der Elst
>> Cc: Rom Walton; BOINC Dev Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: [boinc_dev] WINBUILD: Minimum supported VS is now VS 2010
>>
>>
>>
>> Nothing quite like spending a few hundred dollars to compile free software,
>> is there?  It's not clear from Rom's message whether the incompatibility is
>> in the project files (or that it's too much work to maintain the old project
>> files), or whether its a newer visual C++ version that is necessary.  If
>> it's just the maintenence of old project files and required libraries, a
>> volunteer could do it.
>>
>> As a means of relaxing, I've been slowly working on cross compiling with
>> mingw32/64 on Linux and Cygwin, but, of course, there's no clear indications
>> of what features are necessary in wxWidgets to compile boincmgr.  At least I
>> have the libraries and client compiling.  Of course, MSVC++ happily and
>> silently compiles things that aren't legal on gcc (like implicit conversions
>> from string to char *, what's that about?), so there are a hunderd things to
>> fix to get it working.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Jord van der Elst <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> WINBUILD: Minimum supported VS is now VS 2010
>>
>> So then that means that someone has to retest and rewrite all and everything
>> of
>> http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/wiki/CompileClient#Windows as the
>> compilers the page is written for are VS 2005 (Express) and 2008.
>>
>> And what VS, full VS or is Express also an option?
>> Or is Express still not capable of compiling 64bit applications?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -- Jord van der Elst.
>> _______________________________________________
>> boinc_dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
>> To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
>> (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>boinc_dev mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
>To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
>(near bottom of page) enter your email address.
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
boinc_dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.

Reply via email to