I agree with Christian.
If we have reasonably effective means to recognize and remove spam
accounts/profiles/teams etc., that's good enough.

On 11/14/2016 1:10 AM, Christian Beer wrote:

I don't think account creation is the right place to fix it. Especially
since it will break older Clients.

The question is what do the spammers want? They want to place links on
the webpage. There are currently only two ways to do this.

1. via a publicly accessible profile on a project that is not screening
profiles and does not have reCaptcha enabled for profile creation. The
Client does not do that. If reCaptcha is enabled this is secured.

2. via a forum post wether through the post or through the signature, we
already have measures against this, we should find out why they are not
effective anymore

3. through the URL attribute of the user table, which currently deems to
be not used by the spammers because it is not visible without a profile
(???) I didn't look in detail where this url is used.

4. By creating teams. This is currently also happening and I wonder if
creating the useless accounts should lure us away from the accounts that
create spam teams?

I know this is an arms race but I also think that breaking old clients
would mean to nuke the battlefield instead of putting on more armor. We
are on the defensive here and can't really attack back.

Regards
Christian


_______________________________________________
boinc_dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.

Reply via email to