--- In [email protected], "Fossa Dei Leoni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Dear Hanif bin Saleh,
> kenapa sekarang format final 2-3-2 ya, padahal kan kalo 2-2-1-1-1
bakal > lebih seru.
mungkin alfonso bisa cerita2 dikit juga ttg format pleop nba ;)
Some observers maintain that the advantage accruing to the higher-
ranked team is greater under the 2-2-1-1-1 format than under the 2-3-
2 format, since in the former case the higher-finishing team will
have never played fewer home games than its opponent at any point in
the series, while in the latter the lower team has three of the
first five games at home, and can win the series in its stadium if
the teams had split the first two games. However, this may not be as
helpful to the lower-finishing team as it appears. In the NBA
Finals, which use the 2-3-2 format, only once (in the 2004 NBA
Finals) has the home team swept the three middle games of the
series. Even the road team has swept these three games (for
instance, 1990, 1991, 2001). <<< dr googling dan gue nggatau
terjemahannya >:)
wassalam,
hanif << bukan penikmat nba
HAPUS BAGIAN EMAIL YG TIDAK PERLU SEBELUM ME-REPLY.
==========================================================
Milis Tabloid BOLA
Untuk KELUAR DARI MILIS INI. Kirim Mail kosong (tanpa subject) ke alamat [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
==========================================================
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bolaml/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
