> Any opposition to changing to the new syntax, or do we prefer > skin:triad: test* ? It's fine with me to leave it as it is. Right now, > in my code, it is changed.
sorry, i had as yet no time to check any of your suggested code changes, nor think thoroughly about the implications of combinations of various skin syntaxes etc. I do much prefer to stick to the present syntax for simple array elements in site.config, namely keyword:key: value and not introduce another one like skin[triad]: test* I find it confusing and complicated. Looks a bit like a php array element, but not quite (the colons are missing). I think it would only confuse to introduce into site.config php like syntax. The whole point of site.config was to make syntax simpler. This was also the reason why i suggest to relax the syntax to allow spaces after the colons. Not to insist on a space, just to be a bit more flexible, as an admin not always knows if a space is required. It was to me a logical step from skin: triad to skin: triad: test* but allow also skin:triad: test* and even skin:triad:test* if possible. Anyway, i think it is important to stick to one syntax in config, and the syntax for normal parameters and for array elements is nicely similar. So, those are my strong objections to syntax like skin[triad]: test* ;-) cheers, ~hans --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BoltWire" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boltwire?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
