On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Kevin <[email protected]> wrote: > Worked for me. Very easy to use. I think it would be used a lot if it were > in the core. > > Would have expected [(cite ... )] instead of just plain (cite ...) though I > see it is treated more like markup rather than as a plugin.
Yes, it is a customized markup, not a markup function. I think it is easier to use, and little risk of clashing with normal text. Certainly the ^1 markup is pretty pointless. I really like the anchors and stuff in the plugin. The one thing I will have to do is provide styling hooks, esp for the References section. But that's easy enough. Also, I will probably not include a <hr> in the output as it might not be wanted. I'm thinking wikipedia. And perhaps as Markus suggested, we shouldn't even hardcode the word References. Some might want that a different style from the footnotes. Developing code is easy, giving the right options and yet keeping it simple makes things trickier. :) Cheers, Dan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BoltWire" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boltwire?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
