This seems to be a good solution. Now we have these categories to write something on a page: - create and log for unstructured data - savedata, info, index for structured data.
I suppose I would be able to choose different page names besides of index? Greetings, Martin Am Sonntag, 16. Februar 2014 19:56:24 UTC+1 schrieb Dan: > > All right. I wrested with this quite awhile--esp since I had already > changed the code on my server, but realized you were right. :) > > After much thinking it occurred to me we could / should use the index > command/function > > We already have: > <(index list=members)> // processes pages on site.index.list, using > members index rule > <(index member.1,member.2)> // processes these to pages using any > appropriate index rule > > No we could just add > <(index member.1,member.2 mode=data > legend=title,email,phone,address,city,state,zip index=index.members)> > > This is essentially the same as stash but gives us the advantage of being > able to fully tap into any indexing mode. > > What do you think? > > Cheers, > Dan > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:37 PM, mz <[email protected] <javascript:>>wrote: > >> A semantic purist would say: If it's got nothing to do with data fields, >> keep away from savedata. >> What do you think about log? Log flags could be useful here, too. >> >> Greetings, Martin >> >> Am Montag, 10. Februar 2014 02:54:01 UTC+1 schrieb Dan: >> >>> Hey, just thought I'd ask for some feedback on the stash feature. >>> >>> Right now you can do >>> >>> [command passdata field1,field2 mode=stash field={p}] >>> >>> And it creates an info line like that can be used for all kinds of info >>> processing: >>> >>> some.page: field1 | field2 >>> >>> However, after much reflection it doesn't make sense to keep it in the >>> passdata command--as it's not really passing data to the the next page >>> (like mode=cookie, mode=post or default mode=get). Rather, it is saving >>> data. So I'm inclined to change the savedata command to allow for this >>> instead >>> >>> [command savedata field1,field2 stash=some.index field={p}] >>> >>> Really seems to fit better. It wouldn't affect the normal use of >>> savedata which looks like this: >>> >>> [command savedata field1,field2 page=some.page)] >>> >>> Anyway, just thinking out loud. :) This features still pretty new. Hope >>> no one has gotten too invested in the current syntax. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Dan >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "BoltWire" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:> >> . >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boltwire. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BoltWire" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boltwire. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
