Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What if we somehow queued consecutive seek commands and only > issued them, say, once per second? We would want a single > seek command to have immediate effect, but a ``continuous'' > one (where the user holds the key down) to seek in batches.
Now, this sounds too complicated to me. And maybe I don't really understand what it means. Are you suggesting a virtual key repeat rate of 1? That would defeat the purpose of key repeat. I do think that the jerky seeking is a problem, but with a lot of other good options at hand (keys 1-0 is a great idea) it is not urgent. Unless there's a simple and elegant solution near, like somehow skipping a seek command that would "jerk", I suggest we leave this matter as a TODO item for now. > If we can't make key-repeat-seeking work intelligently, > would you like to bring the old behavior back? I don't > think I would, so maybe we could make it customiziable. I don't think this makes sense from an end-user perspective, so no. >> The mpg321 program segfaults [...] You can forget about this problem now. I compiled a new mpg321 binary and it does not crash. _______________________________________________ bongo-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bongo-devel
