Dieter Deyke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Dieter Deyke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>>> Good. About that other error... could you check to see
>>>> where `process-send-string' is defined on W32?
>>>>
>>>> (Just type `<f1> f process-send-string RET'.)
>>>
>>> process-send-string is a built-in function in `C source code'.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Oh, right. I forgot that GNU Emacs 21 does not display the
>> names of the files in which built-in functions are defined.
>>
>> Maybe I should try to find a W32 machine myself.
>
> I am running:
>
> This is GNU Emacs 22.0.93.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
> of 2007-02-02 on DEYKE1
> Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>
> checked out from CVS 2 days ago, and compiled myself.
> But I did turn off debugging, may be this causes
> that problem.
Hmm... okay. Yes, maybe. I don't know.
That was stupid of me anyway, because it's quite obvious
from the source code that `process-send-string' is only
defined in one place. (Maybe that's even true for built-in
functions in general.)
To me, this seems like a bug in Emacs, because I don't think
it should be possible to trick it into giving an invalid
argument to some file operation.
This is what the relevant code looks like:
rv = emacs_write (outfd, (char *) buf, this);
[...]
if (rv < 0)
[...]
report_file_error ("writing to process", Fcons (proc, Qnil));
So apparently one of `outfd', `buf' and `this' is invalid in
that call to `emacs_write'.
You get that error every time you try to pause, right?
--
Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
bongo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bongo-devel
