[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Jensen) writes: > I read the discussion on emacs-devel. I can't say if it's a bad thing > this wasn't accepted, but that's the way it goes. In any case, I guess > the workaround hack has to stay.
Yeah, I can't say either, except I trust Kim Storm with the display code. If he thinks it may cause problems, then he made the right decision to pull it. -- Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ bongo-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bongo-devel
