Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Jensen) writes: > >> Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> >>>> The `* *' command toggles between a set of marks and the >>>> empty set of marks. [...] >>> >>> I implemented this. >> >> Looks nice, though I haven't done any extensive testing. >> >> When you kill marked tracks, `bongo-toggle-marking' does not >> know about it. It should, otherwise weird things might happen. > > Good catch. I'll install a fix.
I installed a large change that, I believe, fixes this. Since this part of the code is known to be buggy I just went ahead and installed this even though it was large and involved deep changes to the marking code. >> I am a little confused with `bongo-unmark-all'. Is it >> really a good thing that it does not store a marking? > > I don't know --- maybe not. How about renaming it to > `bongo-kill-marking' and moving it to `* k'? Then we > can add `* y' and `* w' and move to a stack if needed. I added `bongo-kill-marking' and `bongo-yank-marking', and made `bongo-toggle-marking' a simple wrapper around those two commands. However, `bongo-unmark-all' is still bound to `U' and still does not save the marking. Do you think we should rebind `U' to `bongo-kill-marking'? -- Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ bongo-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bongo-devel
