Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was confused by those cases (for a long time I thought it > was testing for the symbol `t'), so I replaced this be a > nested `if' construct. I hope I didn't screw it up again:
No worries, you got it right. I could've used `otherwise' in the case form, it may be clearer in this kind of nested structure. I don't usually consider `otherwise', of old habit. Thanks for letting me know it was confusing. _______________________________________________ bongo-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bongo-devel
