[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Jensen) writes: > Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I think playing deserves a better binding than `C-c RET'. >> Now that `g' is free, what about binding it to `bongo-play'? > > How about `o'? (For "open" or someting.) Not that `g' is > particularly bad, I'm just throwing the idea out.
I've been meaning to use `o' for opening buffers. For example, `% m foo RET o' would open a buffer with all the tracks matching `foo'. Just `o' by itself would open an empty buffer. >> When browsing around using `p' and `n', it is a minor pain to >> have to reach for `RET' (even `C-m' is a teeny-weeny pain). > > I hope you're not considering removing the `RET' binding. No, of course not. :-) > Daniel, have you been using vi lately? This worries me. Again, of course not! It's not so much that `C-m' is hard to type, it's more the fact that lots of other commands are _easier_ to type, and that seems wrong, because playing is, like, what Bongo does. You know? :-) -- Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ bongo-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bongo-devel
