Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Jensen) writes: > >> No, we were talking about killing the marking. > > I don't know what you mean here, but maybe it is not important?
No, never mind that. >> We should add this functionality to the command now. We can just write >> it into the command, but I think we need the "selection" of tracks in >> a utility function. > > Yes, that's probably a good idea. As for what to call this > concept, I think `selection' is pretty good --- at least for > internal purposes. There's already the concept of `secondary > selection' though. Yes. I think track selection is good for internal use. As for the user interface, I don't think there is a need to introduce the concept. Where it is described, no information is lost if only the different kinds of selections are listed. _______________________________________________ bongo-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bongo-devel
