[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Jensen) writes: > Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> So where does `f' go? Maybe `&' or `~' (see Dired)? > > I don't get the Dired reference.
The played tracks are likely to be "garbage" in many cases. In another sense, they are "backups" of played tracks. I think the backup metaphor is the better one. Besides, I just put a p/r/m command on `&' the other day (not that that couldn't move, but, well, blah). So, all in favor of `~'? We could also add `* ~' for _marking_ all played tracks --- if that need should ever arise. > There are a lot of unused funny keys; @ # $ ^ = \ and on. Yeah... that's really cool. We have all those funky commands just waiting to be made up. :-) > Then we have `C-c C-f', which is a natural place to stuff away `f'. On the other hand, the current `C-c' keys all control playback, which really isn't anything like what `f' does. We don't have to follow that pattern --- in fact, we won't be able to, because we don't have that many playback-controlling commands, --- but maybe there's a wider pattern, --- something like, "non-local commands that don't just operate on the track under point," --- that includes the flush command. Yeah, I think that makes sense. So `C-c C-f' could work, but I like `~' better. What about you? > I think `f' was a little too easy to hit ... Yeah, that's what I'm thinking too. It makes more sense to put a more harmless command like fast-forward on that key. It's also better to have fast-forward on an easy-to-hit key because you'll want to reach it easily and hit it many times. Finally, it seems aesthetically pleasing to have `f' and `b' bound to symmetrical commands. -- Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ bongo-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bongo-devel
