[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13229077#comment-13229077
]
Flavio Junqueira commented on BOOKKEEPER-168:
---------------------------------------------
Although Ivan's argument sounds right to me, I also agree with Stu that a
time-based collection can be useful in some scenarios. For example, in the case
I tell my users that their messages will be there for at least a month. In
fact, I believe we have considered a time-based mechanism at some point.
If you guys think this is a useful feature, we can try to work it out perhaps
in a separate jira.
> Message bounding on subscriptions
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-168
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-168
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Ivan Kelly
> Assignee: Ivan Kelly
> Fix For: 4.1.0
>
> Attachments: BOOKKEEPER-168.diff, BOOKKEEPER-168.diff,
> BOOKKEEPER-168.diff
>
>
> In hedwig, messages for a subscription will queue up forever if the
> subscriber is offline. In some usecases, this is undesirable, as it will
> eventually mean resource exhaustion. In this JIRA we propose an optional
> change to the subscription contract, which allows the user to set a bound on
> the number of messages which will be queued for its subscription while it is
> offline.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
