On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Ivan Kelly <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Aniruddha, > > 1269 op/s does seem very low. How are your bookies configured? Does each > bookie have a dedicated disk for the ledger dir and journal dir? With > this machine machines I would expect much much higher performance. > Yes, there is one disk for the journal and 3 for ledgers. > > I'm actually going to run the hedwig benchmarks here in the next > couple of days. I'll let you know what result I get. > That would be really helpful. Thanks. > > -Ivan > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 06:28:36PM -0700, Aniruddha Laud wrote: > > I ran the benchmark in hedwig-client with the following command - > > > > java -cp hedwig-client-4.1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar -Dmode=pub -DnTopics=30 > > -DnMsgs=180000 -DmsgSize=50 -DstartTopicLabel=1 > > -Dlog4j.configuration=hedwig_client_log.properties > > -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true > > org.apache.hedwig.client.benchmark.HedwigBenchmark > > hedwig-loadtest-client.conf > > > > The hedwig-loadtest-client.conf contains one default_server_host. I get a > > throughput of 1269 ops/s . The setup is 15 hubs with 15 bookies and an > > ensemble size of 5 and quorum of 3. The number seems low to me. Am I > > missing something? Also, I don't quite understand how to use the > > nPartitions, nParallel options. Also, I have just 1 region. > > > > Regards, > > Aniruddha. > > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Sijie Guo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hello Aniruddha, > > > > > > there is a benchmark for hedwig provided in hedwig-client package. you > > > could check org.apache.hedwig.client.benchmark package. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Sijie > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Aniruddha Laud < > [email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Are there any benchmarks for hedwig that you could share? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Aniruddha. > > > > > > > >
