[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13281048#comment-13281048
 ] 

Flavio Junqueira commented on BOOKKEEPER-237:
---------------------------------------------

Hi Rakesh, I've had a look the document you uploaded. I like the approach in 
general, and I'd like to ask you for some clarifications:

# Just to confirm, elements in the myId list have to be deleted manually, yes? 
If a node is decommissioned, then I suppose we will want to delete from the 
list.
# In step 2 of the monitor (managing the chain), it says that the auditor 
notifies some other bookie that it needs to handle re-replication. How exactly 
does this notification happen? Bookies currently don't talk to each other 
directly. We would need to do this communication through zookeeper if we want 
to keep bookies decoupled.
# In the description of replicators, it says that nodes will compete for 
re-replication entries of a ledger. I like this approach because a bookie may 
refrain from bidding in the case it is overwhelmed. I couldn't understand 
though how the lock is created. The description says L00001_ip:port, but it is 
not clear if ip:port corresponds to the lock holder, in which case the lock 
znode wouldn't be unique.

Also, this proposal is similar to what I discussed with Roger offline. The 
general idea that Roger proposed was to separate assignment of work from 
actually doing the work. Assigning the work is not a heavy task so it is ok to 
be done by a single process. 

Roger, do you have anything to add?  
                
> Automatic recovery of under-replicated ledgers and its entries
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BOOKKEEPER-237
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-237
>             Project: Bookkeeper
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: bookkeeper-client, bookkeeper-server
>    Affects Versions: 4.0.0
>            Reporter: Rakesh R
>            Assignee: Rakesh R
>         Attachments: Auto Recovery Detection - distributed chain 
> approach.doc, Auto Recovery and Bookie sync-ups.pdf
>
>
> As per the current design of BookKeeper, if one of the BookKeeper server 
> dies, there is no automatic mechanism to identify and recover the under 
> replicated ledgers and its corresponding entries. This would lead to losing 
> the successfully written entries, which will be a critical problem in 
> sensitive systems. This document is trying to describe few proposals to 
> overcome these limitations. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to