It might be a good idea to use the review board. Could you put [1] there please?
-Flavio On Jun 25, 2012, at 11:03 PM, Ivan Kelly wrote: > Hi guys, > > By now, there's quite a few JIRAs open for the autoreplication, a lot > of them already with a patch. These do all have dependencies on other > code, so there should be an order in which they should be reviewed. > > I've tried to work out the order as follows. I would be really good to > get the first few JIRAs on this list reviewed and committed soon, as > my git branch now has a lot of stacked dependencies. > > [1] BOOKKEEPER-303 LedgerMetadata should serialized using protobufs > [2] BOOKKEEPER-2 bookkeeper does not put enough meta-data in to do > recovery properly (Requires 1) > [3] BOOKKEEPER-317 Exceptions for replication > > [4] BOOKKEEPER-304 Prepare bookie vs ledgers cache and will be used by > the Auditor (Requires 3) > [5] BOOKKEEPER-246 Recording of underreplication of ledger entries > (Requires 2 & 3) > > [7] BOOKKEEPER-247 Detection of under replication (Requires 2) > [8] BOOKKEEPER-299 Provide LedgerFragmentReplicator which should > replicate the fragments found from LedgerChecker (Requires 8, 5) > > Regards > Ivan
