[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403283#comment-13403283
]
Hudson commented on BOOKKEEPER-302:
-----------------------------------
Integrated in bookkeeper-trunk #582 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-trunk/582/])
BOOKKEEPER-302: No more messages delivered when hub server scans messages
over two ledgers. (sijie via ivank) (Revision 1355079)
Result = FAILURE
ivank :
Files :
* /zookeeper/bookkeeper/trunk/CHANGES.txt
*
/zookeeper/bookkeeper/trunk/hedwig-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hedwig/server/persistence/BookkeeperPersistenceManager.java
*
/zookeeper/bookkeeper/trunk/hedwig-server/src/test/java/org/apache/hedwig/server/persistence/TestBookKeeperPersistenceManager.java
> No more messages delivered when hub server scans messages over two ledgers.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-302
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-302
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 4.1.0
> Reporter: Sijie Guo
> Assignee: Sijie Guo
> Fix For: 4.2.0
>
> Attachments: BOOKKEEPER-302.diff
>
>
> This issue introduce when fixing BOOKKEEPER-215.
> suppose topic T has four messages, message 1 is in ledger 1 while message 2~4
> are in ledger 2. Hub server issue scan (1, 2) and scan (3, 4).
> If hub server works correctly, it just tried to read entry 0 in ledger 1 and
> entry 0 in ledger 2 during scan (1,2), while reading entry 1, 2 in ledger 2
> during scan (3,4).
> But unfortunately, after fixing BOOKKEEPER-215, scan (1,2) would read 0 in
> ledger 1 and read 0, 1 in ledger 2. so reading entry 1 of ledger 2 would be
> issued concurrently in different scans and one reading would fail without any
> callback (this issue is BOOKKEEPER-49).
> Then the systems would be blocked there wait for the response of reading 1 of
> ledger 2 and no messages would be delivered.
> To fix this issue, two thing would be done.
> 1) fix scan issue in hub server to avoid overlapping scanning.
> 2) fix read issue in bookkeeper client.
> fixing 1) could resolve this issue, but it would be better to fix 2) also. it
> should be in jira BOOKKEEPER-49.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
