[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13450674#comment-13450674
]
Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on BOOKKEEPER-325:
------------------------------------------------
Thanks a lot, Ivan for the review!
I think, why I passed checkerCb to getUnderreplicatedFragments is because, 2
times we are calling getUnderreplicatedFragments in rereplicate API. So, just
thought to reuse the same checkerCb obj as they both will run in sequential
manner and can be reused it (infact it is very light object, I can recreate
also :-) ).
> Delay the replication of a ledger if RW found that its last fragment is in
> underReplication.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-325
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-325
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: bookkeeper-auto-recovery
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0
> Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G
> Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G
> Attachments: BOOKKEEPER-325.patch, BOOKKEEPER-325.patch
>
>
> When RW found that ledger's last fragment is in underReplication state, then
> we should delay that ledger replication for some grace period. optimally we
> can replicate other fragments.
> The idea is, Whenever it finds the last fragement is under replicated, It can
> add into PendingReplication list.
> There will be a small daemon, which will check for the timeouts of this
> ledgers.
> Once it timed out , it will trigger the normal replication process if it is
> not in last fragment. Otherwise, it will fence the ledger and will trigger
> the replication nomally.
> see the discussion for more info:
> http://markmail.org/message/ruhhxxgvuqnjlu2s#query:+page:1+mid:f6ifo4sizulwiaem+state:results
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
