[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13457919#comment-13457919
]
Aniruddha commented on BOOKKEEPER-398:
--------------------------------------
[~hustlmsp]
These are only for the bookkeeper client and the hedwig server. We do need all
these(bookkeeper client) stats on the hedwig server to figure out the actual
bottlenecks. I wanted to do the bookkeeper server part differently because I
wanted to get the design reviewed before working it.
> Improving stats collection in Hedwig
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-398
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-398
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: hedwig-server
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0
> Reporter: Aniruddha
> Assignee: Aniruddha
> Fix For: 4.2.0
>
> Attachments: BK-398.patch
>
>
> We have been experimenting with using the Twitter stats package
> (http://twitter.github.com/commons/apidocs/com/twitter/common/stats/package-summary.html)
> for exporting hedwig stats over HTTP. This is open-sourced under the Apache
> license. The motivation for this was better logging of percentile latencies
> and requests-per-second (which are difficult to measure with the current
> implementation of hedwig stats). Is this something the community would be
> interested in? If so, I could work on a patch.
> Reviewboard : https://reviews.apache.org/r/7134/
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
