[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13490407#comment-13490407
]
Yixue (Andrew) Zhu commented on BOOKKEEPER-455:
-----------------------------------------------
BTW, the fencing description https://cwiki.apache.org/BOOKKEEPER/fencing.html
does not match with actual implementation.
According to the description, it seems at one point, the
last-confirmed-entry-id in the add-entry-package was used (returned during
recovery).
> Bookie recovery made assumption that entries are persisted in entry id order
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-455
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-455
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: bookkeeper-server
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0
> Reporter: Yixue (Andrew) Zhu
> Priority: Minor
>
> The entries sent by bookkeeper client can be out of order (due to network).
> The client uses queue to track last-confirmed-entry-id correctly.
> The bookie server will happily persist the entries out of order, i.e. gaps
> are possible. If bookie crash, the recovery can cause last-confirmed-entry-id
> to be set to the last-entry persisted by bookie. The gap is not tracked nor
> detected at server side.
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
