>> If you avoid replacing it though, then you are vulnerable to a another bookie in the ensemble slowing down.
thinking a bit more about it. it is OK for me. >> Currently we guarentee b) but a) wouldn't be hard to do. We just have to avoid removing PendingAddOps until the ackSet is complete. Could we add some comments about that, to clarify the situation? On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Ivan Kelly <[email protected]> wrote: > Currently we guarentee b) but a) wouldn't be hard to do. We just have > to avoid removing PendingAddOps until the ackSet is complete. > > > > > In general, I think avoiding replacing the slow bookie doesn't volatile > the > > contract provided by BookKeeper. > If you avoid replacing it though, then you are vulnerable to a another > bookie in the ensemble slowing down. > > -Ivan >
