[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13679513#comment-13679513
 ] 

Ivan Kelly commented on BOOKKEEPER-563:
---------------------------------------

The patch is backwards(removes the feature rather than adds it), so it needs to 
be generated again. I also have 3 small comments.
1) There's a getJournalRemovePagesFromCache() in server config but no set. We 
should have a set to be consistent (also have it return a ServerConfiguration 
object to allow chaining)
2) Is System.getProperty("os.name").toLowerCase().contains("linux") necessary? 
posix_fadvise is posix, so any system that has it should be compatible, any 
that doesn't should throw a link error.
3) catch should be on the same line as the previous }.
                
> Avoid Journal polluting page cache
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BOOKKEEPER-563
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-563
>             Project: Bookkeeper
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Sijie Guo
>            Assignee: Robin Dhamankar
>             Fix For: 4.3.0
>
>         Attachments: BOOKKEEPER-563.diff
>
>
> writing data into journal which force the data in os buffer cache being used 
> for hot reads, which could have negative affect on performance.
> similar solution is as CASSANDRA-1470.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to