Yes, a jira is the best place to discuss it. Set fix version to 4.3.0. It would also be good to have some info of the driving usecase on the JIRA.
-Ivan On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 11:38:46AM -0500, Whitney Sorenson wrote: > I will look forward to this addition, then. Do you need a jira to track the > possible addition of isClosed() on a ledger handle? > > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:29:02AM -0500, Whitney Sorenson wrote: > > > I think adding isClosed is a step in the right direction, but I'd > > > also like to see a method like BkAdmin#getLedgerIds - that way I > > > don't need to track the list of ledger ids in zk myself. > > We already have a jira for this > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-257 > > > > A scanner type interface would be best for this though, so that if > > there's a lot of ledger ids, we wouldn't run out of memory etc. > > > > -Ivan > > > > > >
