At 03:38 PM 12/5/2002, David Abrahams wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Walter) writes:
>
>>>
>>> 1. Should we do something to make this easier for them?
>>
>> No. We should focus on serving our users.
>
>Our users will be happy and our lives will be easier if their
>compilers finally start working.
I agree with Dave 100%. Boost developers and users both waste far too much
time dealing with broken compilers.
If we can, without a huge amount of effort, make it easier for compiler
suppliers to test against the Boost libraries, that really will end up
being a benefit for users, IMO.
--Beman
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
- [boost] [Config] Testing instructions for compiler vendor... David Abrahams
- Re: [boost] [Config] Testing instructions for compil... John Maddock
- Re: [boost] [Config] Testing instructions for co... David Abrahams
- Re: [boost] [Config] Testing instructions for compil... Douglas Gregor
- Re: [boost] [Config] Testing instructions for co... David Abrahams
- Re: [boost] [Config] Testing instructions for compil... Joerg Walter
- Re: [boost] [Config] Testing instructions for co... David Abrahams
- Re: [boost] [Config] Testing instructions fo... Joerg Walter
- RE: [boost] [Config] Testing instructions fo... Beman Dawes
- RE: [boost] [Config] Testing instructions for compil... Aleksey Gurtovoy
- Re: [boost] [Config] Testing instructions for co... David Abrahams
- Re: [boost] [Config] Testing instructions fo... Gennaro Prota
- Re: [boost] [Config] Testing instruction... David Abrahams
- [boost] Re: [Config] Testing instru... Gennaro Prota
- Re: [boost] Re: [Config] Testin... David Abrahams
- [boost] Re: [Config] Testin... Gennaro Prota
- Re: [boost] Re: [Config] Te... David Abrahams
- Re: [boost] [Config] Testing instructions fo... Douglas Gregor
- Re: [boost] [Config] Testing instruction... John Maddock
