From: "Beman Dawes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The alternative I considered was to try to map the system specific code > into a POSIX errno code. However, the macros seemed messy for C++.
POSIX errno codes were what I meant, yes. On a POSIX implementation there would be no mapping. On Win32, you can use the POSIX-like C RTL functions. I suppose you can introduce integral constant aliases for the <cerrno> macros but is it worth it? Aren't all caps identifiers starting with E reserved for the implementation, anyway? _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
