Terje Sletteb� <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, he asked for a boost::tuple, and this gave a boost::tuple, with the
> exact same type. The reason I provided it was that he seemed to not be
> satisfied with a type that behaves the same way as boost::tuple, but don't
> have the same type. This could be for example if you use boost::tuple in an
> interface, that is being called. Your fold-solution won't work then, will
> it?
Nope. In that case you'll need the PP lib to generalize.
> Then it's a question of which version is more general...
>
> In short, this depends on the requirements for the solution, so don't be so
> quick to write it off, before you know what they are.
It's still "oof".
Feelin' punchy-ly y'rs,
Dave
--
David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
