> > I think this is a good addition, but we should probably make the > > addition for all Win32 compilers since I think this is actually > > part of the Win32 api. > > > > I agree with that. Would it be better to make it a millisec_clock, or > just use the microsec_clock but the resolution is only milliseconds?
Hmm, I'm thinking that for consistency it would probably be better to call it millisec_clock. Jeff _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
