Hi Pavol, Pavol Droba wrote:
> I have been reading the discussiong here about adding the support for > unicode. > > Maybe there is a solution which would allow to have templated versions of > relevant classes AND static library in one box. > > > If we decide that specialization for char and wchar_t is sufficient, the > headers can contain generic template based declarations, but the > implementation will be given only for particular cases ( char and wchar_t > ) and so it can be included in the static lib. Oh.. that's yet another approach. I *really* feel Boost-wide solution is needed. > Similar idea is used in stl for streams, strings and locales. I though that's different. I need to check out again, but IIRC, RW STL shipped with borland's free compiler had all string definitions in headers. > With a help from preprocessor, it should be easy to define two variants > in one place. > Also that could a possibility, that the .cpp file will be included as > headers all this can be done using macros. Yep. Another viable option. - Volodya _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
