Are you planning to implement a "real" pthread_refcount_t for, say, Windows and Linux/x86?
Who? Me?
No, I no nothing about any of this (as I've just demonstrated), it just seemed from your "Maybe one day we'll have a pthread_refcount_t" statement that things could be improved if one existed - so I was suggesting an alternative way to get the same effect as a pthread_refcount_t.
I don't know what atomic<> is but from the name it's probably exactly what I was
suggesting.
Trevor
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
