Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 03:09 PM 6/1/2003, David Abrahams wrote: > >"Pavel Vozenilek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> "Beman Dawes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>> I'll try to trace where BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T is being > set. I'm not > >> so > >>> worried about ADL, at least with VC++ <7.1. > >>> > >> You may look on test table > >> http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/boost/1614864. > > > >I'm not sure what I should expect to get out of that. In order to > >make the toolset changes work, when I turn on wchar_t support I also > >define _NATIVE_WCHAR_T_DEFINED on the command-line, so it all works > >out. > > That will certainly work, but you shouldn't have to do that since the > compiler itself defines _WCHAR_T_DEFINED.
_WCHAR_T_DEFINED is no help at all in getting full wchar_t support if the standard library (Dinkumware) doesn't detect it. See the <limits> header, for example. It only checks for _NATIVE_WCHAR_T_DEFINED. > Since I made the fix earlier this afternoon I am able to compile > some non-boost code correctly which had previously be failing. What fix is that, and did the code use iostreams or limits<wchar_t>? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
