Anthony Williams wrote:
> Writing an XML parser from scratch for boost should, IMHO, have these > features:
[snip]
Writing a lexer/parser is a complex task. It wasn't a requirement, more a suggestion/my opinion on what a boost XML library should be like. There are four possible options:
[snip]
[4] Use another lexer/parser generator. This is an unknown, and again with the Boost distribution.
I'd suggest pccts or antlr:
http://www.antlr.org
It can generate c++ code. IIRC, it has good error recovery, which is something SPIRIT is a bit weak in.
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
