On Sunday 25 May 2003 23:18, Beman Dawes wrote: > I think that Greg Comeau has a good point in his email below - reporting > separate pass / warn / fail statistics in the regression summary can be > misleading to naive readers. > > On the other hand, we certainly want to continue to report warnings in the > tables themselves. > > So it seems to me that in the summary we should lump "pass" and "warn" from > the tables together into a single "pass" category in the summary. > > Opinions?
The number of warnings also provides valuable information but indeed it's not as important as the Pass/Fail categories so this needs to be communicated to the viewers as well. But how ? I support the suggestion of Greg indicating something like: Pass: 67% (3% warning) | Fail (33%) toon _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
