Stefan Seefeld wrote:
>
> Is there any interest in this library evolving
> into a boost::xml library ? If so, what needs to change,
> what needs to be added / removed ?
I think that there is considerable interest in a boost::xml library. But...
Document *document = Document::parse_file(argv[1]);
... I don't believe that a raw pointer based interface is acceptable.
xml::dom::document document = xml::dom::parse_file(argv[1]);
looks much better. BTW why is basic_document<>::write_file virtual but
basic_document<>::clone isn't?
The SAX part looks OK to me.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
