Stefan Seefeld wrote: > > Is there any interest in this library evolving > into a boost::xml library ? If so, what needs to change, > what needs to be added / removed ?
I think that there is considerable interest in a boost::xml library. But... Document *document = Document::parse_file(argv[1]); ... I don't believe that a raw pointer based interface is acceptable. xml::dom::document document = xml::dom::parse_file(argv[1]); looks much better. BTW why is basic_document<>::write_file virtual but basic_document<>::clone isn't? The SAX part looks OK to me. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost