On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:51:27 -0400
David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't see what that has to do with the contradiction I quoted.
> First they say that GCCs newer than 2.95.x will be slower, then later
> they say that the fastest GCC they can find is 3.1.
Well, OK. But, after reading the bit I quoted, I think we can assume
they're not self-contradictory, just sloppy writers :)
> Well, and EH, probably.
Why?
Juanma
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
