> >>In relation to the previous discussion I thought an > >>alternative container may be a circular_deque that could > >>have the kind of flexibility with resizing that > >>also sounds desirable. > > Does a circular_deque sound like the right solution > to your particular application, rather than a > vector-like resizing contiguous circular buffer? > I think these solutions are (mostly) equivalent.
>From practical point of view, adding auto-resize to circular_buffer<> is easier than creating new container. /Pavel _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
