Martin Wille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Abrahams wrote: >> I believe I have now eliminated all the regressions in the RC_1_30_0 >> branch, though recent test updates at >> http://tinyurl.com/k7vl and http://tinyurl.com/jtpd seem to >> contradict that. I find that very strange because I specifically >> reproduced those problems and addressed them on my machine, and the >> results *are* checked in to CVS. Unless the RC_1_30_0 tag has somehow >> magically been made non-sticky, or there's something wrong with the >> testers' CVS update procedure, I don't see how it's possible. >> Would testers for the 1.30.2 release please be sure they're updating >> to RC_1_30_0 and post new results? > > Done. Unfortunately there are new regressions for > optional_test on gcc-2.95.3/Linux.
Okay, I fixed that one. Nobody breathe... I'm going to tag it for release. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
