Trey Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > All, > > Just a question I thought of while looking at the Boost regression > test results. > > It appears that stlport is only used with gcc 2.95.3 (and in Windows > with Intel's C++ compiler and MS C++ 6.0). > > Is boost moving away from supporting stlport? Or are the regressions > not being run for some other reason? > > > Just curious,
It's more the other way around. Boost is supporting what people are running regressions for. If you want it supported, you might have to volunteer to test it. > ps. On a related note: do people have pointers to documentation on > what bugs exist in stlport 4.5.3, i.e. what gcc has fixed? You might try just doing a diff against the "current beta snapshot": http://www.stlport.com/beta/STLport-4.5-0119.tar.gz -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
