David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jarl Friis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I will in line with the announcement suggest that any support needed > > for or related to this particular gcc version should be redirected to > > the supplier of the compiler (i.e. redhat). > > I am noticing a theme in your postings today: you seem remarkably > unsympathetic to anyone who hasn't made what you consider to be the > "right" choice of software systems. At Boost we *generally* try not > to hold these kinds of missteps against our users, because we're more > interested in seeing our software widely used than in avoiding the > hassles of platform dependencies; I don't think you're going to change > that culture with a few postings (at least I hope not)!
You're right. I must have had a bad day, I apologise, hope you are open enough to accept it. I've been out running now, that often helps :-) Again, sorry. This is not the right place to advocate my non-boost related opinions about choice of software. Jarl _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
