Fernando Cacciola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Point taken. > There's no need to argue anymore. > I guess significantly more feedback will weight the balance. > > Thanks for all your comments! > It might look the other way around but they were very helpful.
Bottom line is, and most importantly, optional gets the job done and it does it really well! :-) FWIW, it's easy to write a wrapper around optional that satisfies our wishes (in fact, I sent a class interface scheme to Dave G. tell me if you are interested). It might also be a nice idea to write a partial-specialization of variant<T, empty> that takes advantage of the optimizations of optional. Best Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
