On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 2:17 PM, David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on Wed Oct 29 2008, "Doug Gregor" <doug.gregor-AT-gmail.com> wrote: > >>> I added some debugging into the BoostCore.cmake modularization code so that >>> I can try and figure out what has been and has NOT been modularized. What I >>> am coming up with is 27 libraries have been modularized and there are 79 >>> libraries. So that leaves 52 libraries to be modularized. Is that Correct? >> >> That sounds right. I suggest modularizing from the leaves, and >> avoiding trying to modularize those libraries that are tangled in the >> core of Boost-config, type_traits, MPL, preprocessor, etc. > > Doug, what's your opinion of where that should go in the long run? > Should we leave it alone, or should we eventually break these things > down into modularizable pieces?
It'd leave it alone. Nearly everything else in Boost depends on these libraries, so they're all going to be installed anyway. - Doug _______________________________________________ Boost-cmake mailing list Boost-cmake@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-cmake
