On Oct 31, 2008, at 2:16 PM, Doug Gregor wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Michael Jackson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 30, 2008, at 11:14 PM, Doug Gregor wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Michael Jackson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What I am not sure of is what to do with the remaining headers in
the
"boost" directory. Are those going to be the "core" of Boost or ?
Yeah, that's how I would do it.
So are talking about modularizing what is left into "libs/core"
then? I just
want to be really clear and certain before I make that move.
Sorry, I was very unclear. I would like the remaining libs (mpl,
type_traits, config, and whatever else is in that tangle)
unmodularized for now. There *are* circular dependencies at the
library level and they aren't trivial to untangle. It's better for the
CMake effort to leave those in the non-modularized core and let the
library authors sort out the dependencies later.
- Doug
Ok as I am working through the "testing" part of the CMake build
system it is becoming clear the circular dependencies. Do you want me
to "un-modularize" those for now? ie, turn OFF the modularization
those libraries?
Here are the candidates as I see it right now (This could change 5
minutes from now .. )
mpl
detail
utility
exception
integer
iterator
function
concept_check
concept
preprocessor
config
static_assert
type_traits
_________________________________________________________
Mike Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BlueQuartz Software www.bluequartz.net
Principal Software Engineer Dayton, Ohio
_______________________________________________
Boost-cmake mailing list
Boost-cmake@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-cmake
