On Monday 30 December 2002 04:05 pm, Rene Rivera wrote:
> [2002-12-30] Beman Dawes wrote:
> >At 11:43 AM 12/29/2002, Douglas Gregor wrote:
> > > - We place the C++XML/DocBook sources for each library in
> > >libs/<library-name>/doc_src
> >
> >That works for me.
> >
> > > - We place the top-level DocBook sources in boost/doc_src
> >
> >That seems OK, too.
>
> Isn't the latter inconsistent with the former?
That depends. Is the documentation system a library? I'd expected its final
resting place would be tools/documentation, not in libs/doc_src or
libs/documentation.
> Would it not make more sense to put top level sources at: libs/doc_src ? As
> it would also reduce the polution of the "boost" header directory.
I've revised my proposal to put top level sources in boost/doc, with tarballs
for generated documentation extracting into boost/doc/html, boost/doc/man,
etc. That should cut down pollution of the main "boost" directory.
Doug
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
