On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Jeff Garland wrote:
> >Hmmm... I'm sure that helps somewhow, but I don't know how :)
>
> I'll do more digging and see if I can find the DTD...
>
> >> I can send you some
> >> some xml output from the date_time library if you want to have
> a look.
> >
> >That would be appreciated.
>
> I'll send it to you offlist later this evening -- I don't have
> access to it at the moment.
Thank you.
> >> Hmm, I saw the purpose, but I guess I didn't see that the detailed
> >> description had a unique element so that it could be referenced, but
> >> I may have just missed it...
> >
> >I'm not quite sure you what you mean by "a unique element so that
> >it could be referenced"?
>
> I didn't see anything like
> <detailed description><para> blah blah </para>
> <para> more descr</para>
> </detailed description>
>
> that could be used to filter out or pull out that part
> using XSL or whatever.
>
> Jeff
Well, you could grab all of the <para> elements from inside a <class>,
<method>, etc. tag. I don't recall why I didn't add a <description>
element, but I do recall that I wanted to limit documentation to <para>
elements so that we could (if we wanted) match more closely the style of
the C++ standard, where every single paragraph is numbered.
Doug
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
