On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Jeff Garland wrote:
> > > Seems to me we can use the compounddef for the namespace to extract this. Under
> > > this element there is a <sectiondef kind="func"> that has a list of all the
> > > functions defined in the namespace including the header file. Was there some
> > > reason you didn't use this?
> >
> > Maybe I missed it? I don't have access to the Doxygen XML output at the
> > moment, but I'll try this out later. If this works out, we might not even
> > need to ask for changes to Doxygen. 1.2.18 might "just work".
>
> Take a look in the namesapceboost__1_1date__time.xml file for an example. You can
> look for the function parse_date as an example. In there there is a tag:
> <location file="/home..../date_parsing.hpp" .../>
>
> It might be you didn't use this b/c we would need to do some path stripping to
> get the actual header cleanly...
Ah, right. I had skipped the <location> element for exactly that reason.
I'll update the stylesheets to look for <includes> first and, if it
doesn't exist, use <location>. That way we can stay compatible with the
format in 1.2.18 even if we get <includes> in namespace-level functions in
the future.
Doug
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
